NEETPGAI
FeaturesBlogComparePricing
Log inStart Free
NEETPGAI

AI-powered NEET PG preparation platform. Master all 19 subjects with adaptive MCQs, AI tutoring, and spaced repetition.

Product

  • Features
  • Subjects
  • Previous Year Questions
  • Compare
  • Pricing
  • Blog

Features

  • Adaptive MCQ Practice
  • AI Tutor
  • Mock Tests
  • Spaced Repetition

Resources

  • Blog
  • Study Guides
  • NEET PG Updates
  • Contact & support

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service

Stay updated

© 2026 NEETPGAI. All rights reserved.
    PYQs/2019/Q254
    Verified answer (AI cross-checked + SME reviewed)

    Q254 (2019, Cardiology) — Correct answer: A. It is slower than AV nodal pathway.

    NEET PG 2019
    Q254
    stethoscope Medicine
    Cardiology
    tier-2 (3/3 verifier agreement)

    Identify the false statement about the bundle of Kent

    A. It is slower than AV nodal pathway
    B. Leads to prolonged QRS duration
    C. Leads to short PR interval
    D. It is faster than AV nodal pathway

    Correct Answer: A. It is slower than AV nodal pathway

    The bundle of Kent is an accessory pathway in Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome that conducts impulses faster than the normal AV nodal pathway. This is the fundamental pathophysiological feature of WPW. The AV node has inherent slow conduction velocity (0.05 m/s) due to small-diameter cells and decremental conduction properties, whereas the bundle of Kent is composed of ventricular muscle fibers with rapid conduction velocity (1 m/s), similar to normal ventricular tissue. Therefore, stating that the bundle of Kent is "slower than AV nodal pathway" is false—it is actually faster. This faster conduction through the accessory pathway is what causes the characteristic ECG findings in WPW: a short PR interval (because the impulse bypasses the AV nodal delay) and a prolonged QRS duration (due to the delta wave, representing early ventricular depolarization from the accessory pathway insertion site). The clinical significance in Indian practice is that WPW patients are at risk for atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), which can degenerate into atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response—a potentially life-threatening arrhythmia. Recognition of WPW on ECG is critical for risk stratification and management decisions regarding catheter ablation versus medical therapy.

    Why the other options are wrong

    B. Leads to prolonged QRS duration — This statement is true, not false. The bundle of Kent causes early ventricular depolarization at its insertion site, producing the characteristic delta wave (slurred upstroke of QRS). This delta wave merges with normal AV nodal conduction, resulting in a prolonged QRS complex (>0.12 s). This is a hallmark ECG finding in WPW and is correctly associated with the accessory pathway. C. Leads to short PR interval — This statement is true, not false. Because the bundle of Kent conducts faster than the AV node, the atrial impulse reaches the ventricle earlier, bypassing the normal AV nodal delay. This results in a PR interval <0.12 s (short PR interval), which is a defining ECG criterion for WPW. This is a well-established pathophysiological consequence of accessory pathway conduction. D. It is faster than AV nodal pathway — This statement is true, not false. The bundle of Kent has conduction velocity of 1 m/s (similar to ventricular muscle), whereas the AV node conducts at 0.05 m/s. This faster conduction is the defining feature of the accessory pathway in WPW. The question asks for the false statement, so this correct physiological fact cannot be the answer.

    High-Yield Facts

    • Bundle of Kent conduction velocity: 1 m/s (faster than AV node at 0.05 m/s); this is the pathophysiological basis of WPW syndrome.
    • PR interval in WPW: <0.12 s (short PR interval) due to early ventricular depolarization bypassing AV nodal delay.
    • Delta wave: Slurred upstroke of QRS complex in WPW, representing early ventricular depolarization from the accessory pathway insertion site.
    • QRS duration in WPW: Prolonged (>0.12 s) due to fusion of early accessory pathway depolarization with normal AV nodal conduction.
    • AVRT in WPW: Atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia is the most common tachyarrhythmia; risk of rapid AF with ventricular response is a major clinical concern in Indian practice.

    Mnemonics

    WPW ECG Triad Short PR + Delta Wave + Prolonged QRS = Bundle of Kent is FAST (not slow). Remember: Kent is a speedway, not a slowway. AV Node vs Kent AV Node = Slow (0.05 m/s, decremental conduction). Kent = Fast (1 m/s, muscle fiber conduction). Think: 'Node is a bottleneck, Kent is a bypass'.

    NBE Trap

    NBE pairs "bundle of Kent" with "slower conduction" to trap students who confuse the accessory pathway with the AV node itself. The question specifically asks for the false statement, and many students reflexively associate "accessory pathway" with "abnormal/slow" rather than recognizing that WPW pathophysiology is driven by faster conduction through Kent.

    Clinical Pearl

    In Indian emergency departments, a young patient presenting with palpitations and an ECG showing short PR interval + delta wave should immediately raise suspicion for WPW-related AVRT. Catheter ablation of the accessory pathway is now the gold standard definitive treatment in Indian tertiary centers, offering cure rates >95% and eliminating the risk of sudden cardiac death from rapid AF conduction.

    _Reference: Harrison Ch. 226 (Arrhythmias); Guyton & Hall Ch. 12 (Cardiac Electrophysiology); KD Tripathi Ch. 8 (Cardiac Arrhythmias)_

    Ask AI Tutor about this question

    Stuck on a distractor? Want a worked-through clinical scenario? The AI Tutor is a NEETPGAI Pro feature — sign up free to practice the full question bank, then unlock the AI Tutor when you're ready.

    Explain this concept in plain language
    Why is each wrong option wrong?
    Give me a clinical scenario where this is tested
    Sign up free Already have an account? Log in

    Free to start, no credit card required. The 3 prompts/day quota is shared with practice + tutor + deep-dive across NEETPGAI.

    Memory-based reconstruction

    NBE does not officially release NEET PG papers per the 2025 Supreme Court directive. This question was reconstructed from 1 community source: PrepLadder NEET PG 2019 Recall PDF. Cross-verified by Claude Haiku 4.5 + Gemini 2.5 Flash + community-aggregate vote, then reviewed by a practising medical SME.

    ← All NEET PG 2019 questionsPractice with AI Tutor →

    Join our NEET PG community

    Daily MCQs, study tips, and topper strategies on Telegram.

    Join on Telegram →